Table 6: Hypothesis Test Results with Various Measures of State Initiative Process
	Pure		Pure
	Init & Ref		initiative		Legisl.		Qualify		Avg. annual
	dummy		dummy		insulation		difficulty		Use
Campaign Finance Policy	b	p	b	p	b	p	b	p	b	p
Ltd labor contributions	0.17	.35	0.33	.10	-0.005	.11	-0.05	.08	0.15	.01
Ltd. party contributions	0.43	.01	0.58	.00	-0.008	.00	-0.07	.00	0.14	.01
Ltd. corporate contributions	0.14	.42	0.25	.18	-0.006	.06	-0.04	.08	0.14	.01
Index of contrib. Regs.	0.96	.32	2.19	.04	-0.37	.04	-0.29	.04	0.90	.00
Abortion Policy
Restrictiveness index*	-5.02	.90	-0.89	.90	-2.43	.41	6.76	.01	-15.95	.10
Internal Political Efficacy
Better informed than others	0.02	.73	0.04	.62	-0.004	.71	-0.005	.56	0.0014	.05
More qualified to participate	0.18	.03	0.18	.06	-0.029	.00	-0.025	.00	0.0017	.01
Politics not complicated	0.12	.80	0.04	.46	-0.009	.43	-0.007	.44	0.0015	.01
Internal effic. Index	0.35	.19	0.36	.22	-0.05	.12	-0.049	.09	0.0056	.01
External Political Efficacy
Officials don't care	0.01	.87	0.01	.91	-0.003	.79	-0.003	.07	0.0012	.05
Have no say	0.09	.35	0.14	.17	-0.028	.03	-0.02	.08	0.0022	.01
External effic. Index	0.08	.53	0.15	.27	-0.032	.05	-0.023	.11	0.0026	.01
Cell entries are OLS coefficients from multivariate models.  Coefficients for control variables omitted.
p = probability of b, two-tail test.
*coefficients here are from the relevant interaction terms